Goal: A partial description of the joint distribution of the data is provided here. Three aspects of the data are of importance, the first two of which you should already be familiar with from univariate statistics. These are:
Statistics, as a subject matter, is the science and art of using sample information to make generalizations about populations.
A population is the collection of all people, plants, animals, or objects of interest about which we wish to make statistical inferences (generalizations). The population may also be viewed as the collection of all possible random draws from a stochastic model; for example, independent draws from a normal distribution with a given population mean and population variance.
A population parameter is a numerical characteristic of a population. In nearly all statistical problems we do not know the value of a parameter because we do not measure the entire population. We use sample data to make an inference about the value of a parameter.
A sample is the subset of the population that we actually measure or observe.
A sample statistic is a numerical characteristic of a sample. A sample statistic estimates the unknown value of a population parameter. Information collected from sample statistic is sometimes refered to as Descriptive Statistic.
Here are the Notations that will be used:
\(X_{ij}\) = Observation for variable j in subject i .
\(p\) = Number of variables
\(n\) = Number of subjects
In the example to come, we'll have data on 737 people (subjects) and 5 nutritional outcomes (variables). So,
\(p\) = 5 variables
\(n\) = 737 subjects
In multivariate statistics we will always be working with vectors of observations. So in this case we are going to arrange the data for the p variables on each subject into a vector. In the expression below, \(\textbf{X}_i\) is the vector of observations for the \(i\)^{th} subject, \(i\) = 1 to \(n\) (737). Therefore, the data for the \(j\)^{th} variable will be located in the \(j\)^{th} element of this subject's vector, \(j\) = 1 to \(p\) (5).
\[\mathbf{X}_i = \left(\begin{array}{l}X_{i1}\\X_{i2}\\ \vdots \\ X_{ip}\end{array}\right)\]
Upon completion of this lesson, you should be able to do the following:
Throughout this course, we’ll use the ordinary notations for the mean of a variable. That is, the symbol \(\mu\) is used to represent a (theoretical) population mean and the symbol \(\bar{x}\) is used to represent a sample mean computed from observed data. In the multivariate setting, we add subscripts to these symbols to indicate the specific variable for which the mean is being given. For instance, \(\mu_1\) represents the population mean for variable \(x_1\) and \(\bar{x}_{1}\) denotes a sample mean based on observed data for variable \(\bar{x}_{1}\).
The population mean is the measure of central tendency for the population. Here, the population mean for variable \(j\) is
\[\mu_j = E(X_{ij})\]
The notation \(E\) stands for statistical expectation; here \(E(X_{ij})\) is the mean of \(X_{ij}\) over all members of the population, or equivalently, over all random draws from a stochastic model. For example, \(\mu_j = E(X_{ij})\) may be the mean of a normal variable.
The population mean \(\mu_j\) for variable \(j\) can be estimated by the sample mean
\[\bar{x}_j = \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n}X_{ij}\]
Note: the sample mean \(\bar{x}_{j}\), because it is a function of our random data is also going to have a mean itself. In fact, the population mean of the sample mean is equal to population mean \(\mu_j\); i.e.,
\[E(\bar{x}_j) = \mu_j \]
Therefore, the \(\bar{x}_{j}\) is unbiased for \(\mu_j\).
Another way of saying this is that the mean of the \(\bar{x}_{j}\)’s over all possible samples of size \(n\) is equal to \(\mu_j\).
Recall that the population mean vector is \(\boldsymbol{\mu}\) which is a collection of the means for each of the population means for each of the different variables.
\[\boldsymbol{\mu} = \left(\begin{array}{c} \mu_1 \\ \mu_2\\ \vdots\\ \mu_p \end{array}\right)\]
We can estimate this population mean vector, \(\boldsymbol{\mu}\), by \(\mathbf{\bar{x}}\). This is obtained by collecting the sample means from each of the variables in a single vector. This is shown below.
\[\mathbf{\bar{x}} = \left(\begin{array}{c}\bar{x}_1\\ \bar{x}_2\\ \vdots \\ \bar{x}_p\end{array}\right) = \left(\begin{array}{c}\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n}X_{i1}\\ \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n}X_{i2}\\ \vdots \\ \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n}X_{ip}\end{array}\right) = \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n}\textbf{X}_i\]
Just as the sample means, \(\bar{x}\), for the individual variables are unbiased for their respective population means, the sample mean vector is unbiased for the population mean vector.
\[E(\mathbf{\bar{x}}) = E\left(\begin{array}{c}\bar{x}_1\\\bar{x}_2\\ \vdots \\\bar{x}_p\end{array}\right) = \left(\begin{array}{c}E(\bar{x}_1)\\E(\bar{x}_2)\\ \vdots \\E(\bar{x}_p)\end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}\mu_1\\\mu_2\\\vdots\\\mu_p\end{array}\right)=\boldsymbol{\mu}\]
A variance measures the degree of spread (dispersion) in a variable’s values. Theoretically, a population variance is the average squared difference between a variable’s values and the mean for that variable. The population variance for variable \(x_j\) is
\[\sigma_j^2 = E(x_ju_j)^2\]
Note that the squared residual \((X_{ij}\mu_{j})^2\) is a function of the random variable \(X_{ij}\). Therefore, the squared residual itself is random, and has a population mean. The population variance is thus the population mean of the squared residual. We see that if the data tend to be far away from the mean, the squared residual will tend to be large, and hence the population variance will also be large. Conversely, if the the data tend to be close to the mean, the squared residual will tend to be small, and hence the population variance will also be small.
The population variance \(\sigma _{j}^{2}\) can be estimated by the sample variance
\[s_j^2 = \frac{1}{n1}\sum_{i=1}^{n}(X_{ij}\bar{x}_j)^2=\frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n}X_{ij}^2(\left(\sum_{i=1}^{n}X_{ij}\right)^2/n)}{n1}\]
The first expression in this formula is most suitable for interpreting the sample variance. We see that it is a function of the squared residuals; that is, take the difference between the individual observations and their sample mean, and then square the result. Here, we may observe that if observations tend to be far away from their sample means, then the squared residuals and hence the sample variance will also tend to be large.
If on the other hand, the observations tend to be close to their respective sample means, then the squared differences between the data and their means will be small, resulting in a small sample variance value for that variable.
The last part of the expression above, gives the formula that is most suitable for computation, either by hand or by a computer! Since the sample variance is a function of the random data, the sample variance itself is a random quantity, and so has a population mean. In fact, the population mean of the sample variance is equal to the population variance:
\[E(s_j^2) = \sigma_j^2\]
That is, the sample variance \(s _{j}^{2}\) is unbiased for the population variance \(\sigma _{j}^{2}\).
Our textbook (Johnson and Wichern, 6th ed.) uses a sample variance formula derived using maximum likelihood estimation principles. In this formula, the division is by \(n\) rather than \(n1\).
\[s_j^2 = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n}(x_{ij}\bar{x}_j)^2}{n}\]
Suppose that we have observed the following \(n =\) 5 resting pulse rates: 64, 68, 74, 76, 78
The sample mean is \(\bar{x} = \frac{64+68+74+76+78}{5}=72\).
The maximum likelihood estimate of the variance, the one consistent with our text, is
\[s^2 = \frac{(6472)^2+(6872)^2+(7472)^2+(7672)^2+(7872)^2}{5}=\frac{136}{5} = 27.2\]
The standard deviation based in this method is \(s=\sqrt{27.2}=5.215\).
The more commonly used variance estimate, the one given by statistical software, would be \(\frac{136}{51}=34\). The standard deviation would be \(s = \sqrt{34}=5.83\).
Association is concerned with how each variable is related to the other variable(s). In this case, the first measure that we will consider is the covariance between two variables j and k.
The population covariance is a measure of the association between pairs of variables in a population. Here, the population covariance between variables j and k is
\[\sigma_{jk} = E\{(X_{ij}\mu_j)(X_{ik}\mu_k)\}\quad\mbox{for }i=1,\ldots,n\]
Note that the product of the residuals (X_{ij}  μ_{j}) and (X_{ik}  μ_{k}) for variables j and k, respectively, is a function of the random variables X_{ij} and X_{ik}. Therefore, (X_{ij}  μ_{j})(X_{ik}  μ_{k}) is itself random, and has a population mean. The population covariance is defined to be the population mean of this product of residuals. We see that if either both variables are greater than their respective means, or if they are both less than their respective means, then the product of the residuals will be positive. Thus, if the value of variable j tends to be greater than its mean when the value of variable k is larger than its mean, and if the value of variable j tends to be less than its mean when the value of variable k is smaller than its mean, then the covariance will be positive. Positive population covariances mean that the two variables are positively associated; variable j tends to increase with increasing values of variable k.
Negative association can also occur. If one variable tends to be greater than its mean when the other variable is less than its mean, the product of the residuals will be negative, and you will obtain a negative population covariance. Variable j will tend to decrease with increasing values of variable k.
The population covariance σ_{jk} between variables j and k can be estimated by the sample covariance. This can be calculated using the formula below:
\[s_{jk} = \frac{1}{n1}\sum_{i=1}^{n}(X_{ij}\bar{x}_j)(X_{ik}\bar{x}_k)=\frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n}X_{ij}X_{ik}(\sum_{i=1}^{n}X_{ij})(\sum_{i=1}^{n}X_{ik})/n}{n1}\]
Just like in the formula for variance we have two expressions that make up this formula. The first half of the formula is most suitable for understanding the interpretation of the sample covariance, and the second half of the formula is used for calculation.
Looking at the first half of the expression, the product inside the sum is the residual differences between variable j and its mean times the residual differences between variable k and its mean. We can see that if either both variables tend to be greater than their respective means or less than their respective means, then the product of the residuals will tend to be positive leading to a positive sample covariance.
Conversely if one variable takes values that are greater than its mean when the opposite variable takes a value less than its mean, then the product will take a negative value. In the end, when you add up this product over all of the observations, you will end up with a negative covariance.
So, in effect, a positive covariance would indicate a positive association between the variables j and k. And a negative association is when the covariance is negative.
For computational purposes we will use the second half of the formula. For each subject, the product of the two variables is obtained, and then the products are summed to obtain the first term in the numerator. The second term in the numerator is obtained by taking the product of the sums of variable over the n subjects, then dividing the results by the sample size n. The difference between the first and second terms is then divided by n 1 to obtain the covariance value.
Again, sample covariance is a function of the random data, and hence, is random itself. As before, the population mean of the sample covariance s_{jk} is equal the population covariance σ_{jk}; i.e.,
\[E(s_{jk})=\sigma_{jk}\]
That is, the sample covariance s_{jk} is unbiased for the population covariance σ_{jk}.
The sample covariance is a measure of the association between a pair of variables:
s_{jk} = 0 implies that the two variables are uncorrelated. (Note that this does not necessarily imply independence, we'll get back to this later.)
s_{jk} > 0 implies that the two variables are positively correlated; i.e., values of variable j tend to increase with increasing values of variable k. The larger the covariance, the stronger the positive association between the two variables.
s_{jk} < 0 implies that the two variables are negatively correlated; i.e., values of variable j tend to decrease with increasing values of variable k. The smaller the covariance, the stronger the negative association between the two variables.
Recall, that we had collected all of the population means of the p variables into a mean vector. Likewise, the population variances and covariances can be collected into the population variancecovariance matrix: This is also known by the name of population dispersion matrix.
\[\Sigma = \left(\begin{array}{cccc}\sigma^2_1 & \sigma_{12} & \dots & \sigma_{1p}\\ \sigma_{21} & \sigma^2_{2} & \dots & \sigma_{2p}\\ \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots\\ \sigma_{p1} & \sigma_{p2} & \dots &\sigma^2_p\end{array}\right)\]
Note that the population variances appear along the diagonal of this matrix, and the covariance appear in the offdiagonal elements. So, the covariance between variables j and k will appear in row j and column k of this matrix.
The population variancecovariance matrix may be estimated by the sample variancecovariance matrix. The population variances and covariances in the above population variancecovariance matrix are replaced by the corresponding sample variances and covariances to obtain the sample variancecovariance matrix:
\( S = \left(\begin{array}{cccc}s^2_1 & s_{12} & \dots & s_{1p}\\ s_{21} & s^2_2 & \dots & s_{2p}\\ \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ s_{p1} & s_{p2} & \dots & s^2_{p}\end{array}\right)\)
Note that the sample variances appear along diagonal of this matrix and the covariances appear in the offdiagonal elements. So the covariance between variables j and k will appear in the jkth element of this matrix.
Notes:
S (the sample variancecovariance matrix) is symmetric; i.e., s_{jk} = s_{kj}.
S is unbiased for the population variance covariance matrix Σ ; i.e.,
\(E(S) = \left(\begin{array}{cccc} E(s^2_1) & E(s_{12}) & \dots & E(s_{1p}) \\ E(s_{21}) & E(s^2_{2}) & \dots & E(s_{2p})\\ \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ E(s_{p1}) & E(s_{p2}) & \dots & E(s^2_p)\end{array}\right)=\Sigma\).
Because this matrix is a function of our random data, this means that the elements of this matrix are also going to be random, and the matrix on the whole is random as well. The statement 'Σ is unbiased' means that the mean of each element of that matrix is equal to the corresponding elements of the population.
In matrix notation, the sample variancecovariance matrix may be computed used the following expressions:
\[S = \frac{1}{n1}\sum_{i=1}^{n}(X_i\bar{x})(X_i\bar{x})' = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n}X_iX_i'(\sum_{i=1}^{n}X_i)(\sum_{i=1}^{n}X_i)'/n}{n1}\]
Just as we have seen in the previous formulas, the first half of the formula is used in interpretation, and the second half of the formula is what is used for calculation purposes.
Looking at the second term you can see that the first term in the numerator involves taking the data vector for each subject and multiplying by its transpose. The resulting matrices are then added over the n subjects. To obtain the second term in the numerator, first compute the sum of the data vectors over the n subjects, then take the resulting vector and multiply by its transpose; then divide the resulting matrix by the number of subjects n. Take the difference between the two terms in the numerator and divide by n  1.
Suppose that we have observed the following n = 4 observations for variables x_{1} and x_{2} .
x_{1}  x_{2} 
6  3 
10  4 
12  7 
12  6 
The sample means are \(\bar{x_{1}}\) = 10 and \(\bar{x_{2}}\)_{ }= 5. The maximum likelihood estimate of the covariance is the average product of deviations from the mean:
\[s_{12}=\frac{(610)(35)+(1010)(45)+(1210)(75)+(1210)(65)}{41}=\frac{8+0+4+2}{41}=4.67\]
The positive value reflects the fact that as x_{1} increases, x_{2} also tends to increase.
Problem: The magnitude of the covariance value is not particularly helpful as it is a function of the magnitudes (scales) of the two variables. This quantity is a function of the variability of the two variables, and so, it is hard to tease out the effects of the association between the two variables from the effects of their dispersions.
Note, however, that the covariance between variables i and j must lie between the product of the two component standard deviations of variables i and j, and negative of that same product:
_{\[s_i s_j \le s_{ij} \le s_i s_j\]}
In an undergraduate statistics class, n = 30 females reported their heights (inches), and also measured their left forearm length (cm), left foot length (cm), and head circumference (cm). The sample variancecovariance matrix is the following:
Notice that the matrix has four row and four columns because there are four variables being considered. Also notice that the matrix is symmetric.
Here are a few examples of the information in the matrix:
All covariance values are positive so all pairwise associations are positive. But, the magnitudes do not tell us about the strength of the associations. To assess the strength of an association, we use correlation values.
Correlation: This suggests an alternative measure of association. The population correlation is defined to be equal to the population covariance divided by the product of the population standard deviations:
\[\rho_{jk} = \frac{\sigma_{jk}}{\sigma_j\sigma_k}\]
The population correlation may be estimated by substituting into the formula the sample covariances and standard deviations:
\[r_{jk}=\frac{s_{jk}}{s_js_k}=\frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n}X_{ij}X_{ik}(\sum_{i=1}^{n}X_{ij})(\sum_{i=1}^{n}X_{ik})/n}{\sqrt{\{\sum_{i=1}^{n}X^2_{ij}(\sum_{i=1}^{n}X_{ij})^2/n\}\{\sum_{i=1}^{n}X^2_{ik}(\sum_{i=1}^{n}X_{ik})^2/n\}}}\]
It is very important to note that the population as well as the sample correlation must lie between 1 and 1.
\[1 \le \rho_{jk} \le 1\]
\[1 \le r_{jk} \le 1\]
Therefore:
\(\rho_{jk}\) = 0 indicates, as you might expect, that the two variables are uncorrelated .
\(\rho_{jk}\) close to +1 will indicate a strong positive dependence
\(\rho_{jk}\) close to 1 indicates a strong negative dependence
Sample correlation coefficients also have similar interpretation.
Correlation Matrix
For a collection of p variables, the correlation matrix is a p × p matrix that displays the correlations between pairs of variables. For instance, the value in the jth row and kth column gives the correlation between variables x_{j} and x_{k }. The correlation matrix is symmetric so that the value in the kth row and jth column is also the correlation between variables x_{j} and x_{k} . The diagonal elements of the correlation matrix are all identically equal to 1.
The sample correlation matrix is denoted as R.
\[\textbf{R} = \left(\begin{array}{cccc} 1 & r_{12} & \dots & r_{1p}\\ r_{21} & 1 & \dots & r_{2p}\\ \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ r_{p1} & r_{p2} & \dots & 1\end{array}\right)\]
The following covariance matrix show the pairwise covariances for the height, left forearm, left foot and head circumference measurements of n = 30 female college students.
Here are two examples of calculating a correlation coefficient:
The complete sample correlation matrix for this example is the following:
Overall, we see moderately strong linear associations among the variables height, left arm and left foot and quite weak (almost 0) associations between head circumference and the other three variables.
In practice, use scatter plots of the variables to fully understand the associations between variables. It is not a good idea to rely on correlations without seeing the plots. Correlation values are affected by outliers and curvilinearity.
Let us take a look at an example. In 1985, the USDA commissioned a study of women’s nutrition. Nutrient intake was measured for a random sample of 737 women aged 2550 years. The following variables were measured:
We will use the SAS program called nutrient.sas to carry out the calculations that we would like to see.
The lines of this program are saved in a simple text file with a .sas file extension. If you have SAS installed on the machine on which you have download this file, it should launch SAS and open the program within the SAS application. Use the "Inspect" button below to work your way through the lines of programming. Marking up a print out of the SAS program is also a good strategy for learning how this program is put together.
The first part of this SAS output, (nutrient2.lst), is the results of the Means Procedure  proc means. Because the SAS output is usually a relatively long document, printing these pages of output out and marking them with notes is highly recommended if not required!
The first column of the Means Procedure table above gives the variable name. The second column reports the sample size. This is then followed by the sample means (third column) and the sample standard deviations (fourth column) for each variable. I have copied these values in to the table below. I have also rounded these numbers a bit to make them easier to use for this example.

Click on the graphic or the link below to walk through how to find descriptive statistics for the Women's Nutrition data set in Minitab.
A summary of the descriptive statistics is given here for ease of reference.
Variable

Mean

Standard Deviation

Calcium

624.0 mg

397.3 mg

Iron

11.1 mg

6.0 mg

Protein

65.8 mg

30.6 mg

Vitamin A

839.6 μg

1634.0 μg

Vitamin C

78.9 mg

73.6 mg

Notice that the standard deviations are large relative to their respective means, especially for Vitamin A & C. This would indicate a high variability among women in nutrient intake. However, whether the standard deviations are relatively large or not, will depend on the context of application. Skill in interpreting the statistical analysis depends very much on the researcher's subject matter knowledge.
The variancecovariance matrix is also copied into the matrix below.
\[S = \left(\begin{array}{RRRRR}157829.4 & 940.1 & 6075.8 & 102411.1 & 6701.6 \\ 940.1 & 35.8 & 114.1 & 2383.2 & 137.7 \\ 6075.8 & 114.1 & 934.9 & 7330.1 & 477.2 \\ 102411.1 & 2383.2 & 7330.1 & 2668452.4 & 22063.3 \\ 6701.6 & 137.7 & 477.2 & 22063.3 & 5416.3 \end{array}\right)\].
Because this covariance is positive, we see that calcium intake tends to increase with increasing iron intake. The strength of this positive association can only be judged by comparing s_{12} to the product of the sample standard deviations for calcium and iron. This comparison is most readily accomplished by looking at the sample correlation between the two variables.
Sample Correlations
The sample correlations are included in the table below.
Calcium

Iron

Protein

Vit. A

Vit. C


Calcium

1.000

0.395

0.500

0.158

0.229

Iron

0.395

1.000

0.623

0.244

0.313

Protein

0.500

0.623

1.000

0.147

0.212

Vit. A

0.158

0.244

0.147

1.000

0.184

Vit. C

0.229

0.313

0.212

0.184

1.000

Here we can see that the correlation between each of the variables and themselves are all equal to one, and the offdiagonal elements give the correlation between each of the pairs of variables.
Generally, we look for the strongest correlations first. The results above suggest that protein, iron, and calcium are all positively associated. Each of these three nutrients intake increases with increasing values of the remaining two.
The coefficient of determination is another measure of association and is simply equal to the square of the correlation. For example, in this case, the coefficient of determination between protein and iron is (0.623)^{2} or about 0.388.
\[r^2_{23} = 0.62337^2 = 0.38859\]
This says that about 39% of the variation in iron intake is explained by protein intake. Or, conversely, 39% of the protein intake is explained by the variation in the iron intake. Both interpretations are equivalent.
Sometimes it is also useful to have an overall measure of dispersion in the data. In this measure it would be good to include all of the variables simultaneously, rather than one at a time. In the past we looked at the individual variables and their variances to measure the individual variances. Here we are going to look at measures of dispersion of all variables together, particularly we are going to look at such measures that look at total variation.
The variance \(\sigma _{j}^{2}\) measures the dispersion of an individual variable X_{j.} The following two are used to measure the dispersion of all variables together.
To understand total variation we first must find the trace of a square matrix. A square matrix is a matrix that has an equal number of columns and rows. Important examples of square matrices include the variancecovariance and correlation matrices.
The trace of an n x n matrix A is
\[trace(\textbf{A}) = \sum_{i=1}^{n}a_{ii}\]
For instance, in a 10 x 10 matrix, the trace is the sum of the diagonal elements.
The total variation, therefore, of a random vector X is simply the trace of the population variancecovariance matrix.
\[trace (\Sigma) = \sigma^2_1 + \sigma^2_2 +\dots \sigma^2_p\]
Thus, the total variation is equal to the sum of the population variances.
The total variation can be estimated by:
\[trace(S) = s^2_1+s^2_2+\dots +s^2_p\]
The total variation is of interest for principal components analysis and factor analysis and we will look at these concepts later in this course.
Let us use the data from the USDA women’s health survey again to illustrate this. We have taken the variances for each of the variables from software output and have placed them in the table below.
Variable

Variance

Calcium

157829.4

Iron

35.8

Protein

934.9

Vitamin A

2668452.4

Vitamin C

5416.3

Total

2832668.8

The total variation for the nutrient intake data is determined by simply adding up all of the variances for each of the individual variables. The total variation equals 2,832,668.8. This is a very large number.
Problem: The problem with total variation is that it does not take into account correlations among the variables.
These plots show simulated data for pairs of variables with different levels of correlation. In each case, the variances for both variables are equal to 1, so that the total variation is 2.
When the correlation r = 0, then we see a shotgunblast pattern of points, widely dispersed over the entire range of the plot.
Increasing the correlation to r = 0.7, we see an ovalshaped pattern. Note that the points are not as widely dispersed.
Increasing the correlation to r = 0.9, we see that the points fall along a 45 degree line, and are even less dispersed.
Thus, the dispersion of points decreases with increasing correlation. But, in all cases, the total variation is the same. The total variation does not take into account the correlation between the two variables.
Fixing the variances, the scatter of the data will tend to decrease as r → 1.
To take into account the correlations among pairs of variables an alternative measure of overall variance is suggested. This measure takes a large value when the various variables show very little correlation among themselves. In contrast, this measure takes a small value if the variables show very strong correlation among themselves, either positive or negative. This particular measure of dispersion is the generalized variance. In order to define the generalized variance we first define the determinant of the matrix.
We will start simple with a 2 x 2 matrix and then we will move on to more general definitions for larger matrices.
Let us consider the determinant of a 2 x 2 matrix B as shown below. Here we can see that it is the product of the two diagonal elements minus the product of the offdiagonal elements.
\[\textbf{B} =\left\begin{array}{cc}b_{11} & b_{12}\\ b_{21} & b_{22}\end{array}\right = b_{11}b_{22}b_{12}b_{21}\]
Here is an example of a simple matrix that has the elements 5, 1, 2 and 4. You will get the determinant 18. The product of the diagonal 5 x 4 subtracting the elements of the offdiagonal 1 x 2 yields an answer of 18:
\[\left\begin{array}{cc}5 & 1\\2 & 4\end{array}\right = 5 \times 4  1\times 2= 202 =18\]
More generally the determinant of a general p x p matrix B is given by the expression shown below:
\[\textbf{B} = \sum_{j=1}^{p}(1)^{j+1}b_{1j}B_{1j}\]
The expression involves the sum over all of the first row of B. Note that these elements are noted by b_{1j}. These are premultiplied by 1 raised to the (j + 1)^{th} power, so that basically we are going to have alternating plus and minus signs in our sum. The matrix B_{1j} is obtained by deleting row 1 and column j from the matrix B.
By definition the generalized variance of a random vector X is equal to Σ, the determinant of the variance/covariance matrix. The generalized variance can be estimated by calculating S, the determinant of the sample variance/covariance matrix.
The generalized inverse for the Women's Nutrition data can be calculated using the SAS program nutrient3.sas below.
Click the SAS Program icon on the right to open this program with the SAS application that is installed on the computer you are working on. If you do not have SAS installed, a new window will open with the text of the program in it.
Click on the arrow in the window below to find the generalized variance for the Women's Nutrition Data using Minitab. To do this you will need the macro file MATRIXDET.txt.
The output from this program reports the sample variance/covariance matrix.
You should compare this output with the sample variance/covariance matrix output obtained from the corr procedure from our last program, nutrient2. You will see that we have the exact same numbers that were presented before. The generalized variance is that single entry in the far upper right hand corner. Here we see that the generalized variance is:
\[S = 2.83 \times 10^{19}\]
Interpretation:
In terms of interpreting the generalized variance, the larger the generalized variance the more dispersed the data are. Note that the volume of space occupied by the cloud of data points is going to be proportional to the square root of the generalized variance.
Women’s Nutrition Example:
\[\sqrt{S} = 5.37 \times 10^9\]
This represents a very large volume of space. Again, the interpretation of this particular number depends largely on subject matter knowledge. In this case, we can not say if this is a particularly large number or not unless we know more about women's nutrition.
In this lesson we learned how to:
Next, complete the homework problems that will give you a chance to put what you have learned to use...